Portfolio No 5 4.3 Playing with Literacy & Numeracy 0- 4 27/10/2013 http://cathysportfolio.blogspot.com.au
This week’s
portfolio experience reflects a teaching story that clearly shows where
potential prejudices and projections can result in the outcomes in criteria in
4.3.
During my own
school years, in a time where families were larger than they are today it was a
more than acceptable thing for siblings to be placed in the same class.
Generally most classes had 48 students with 2 or 3 sets of siblings. Usually
the year 4 and 5’s were together as some children had moved to their high
schools earlier (mainly boys) so classes were combined.
A pinnacle
point in my schooling was the day a teacher stood two siblings up in the class
and compared their work. One sibling was a creative writer whose stories
captivated an audience – although this students writing was very untidy (in the
teacher’s eyes). The other siblings’ writing was extremely neat, but what she
wrote did not express a interesting read. The teacher asked both siblings to
stand in front of the class whilst she compared the two pieces of work finally
stating ‘If we could put these two children’s work together we would have the
perfect child’ It was a terrible moment in time and should never be
repeated.
This past moment
in time allows me to reflect and feel empathy towards those children: something
I can think about in my own teaching. The importance of respecting children as
individuals promotes their learning without any comparisons, from the earliest
years.
From the
earliest age motivational consequences cannot be overlooked. Wigfield
& Eccles, 1992 concise the importance of one’s ability beliefs,
expectations for success and subjective task values are relative to a child’s
performance. Attached is expectancy – value theory model of achievement valuation.
EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY
Eccles, Wigfield & colleagues, Expectancy - value model of achievement motivation.
Cathy
Stanbury
References
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement
Motivation. Contemporary
Educational Psychology 25, 68–81 (2000)
http://aguda.org.il/files/academic_bank/2/322/55859/2_2007_55859_1170980723.97.pdf